does doing great things require selflessness?
+(as always, i'm thinking out loud.)
lately i've been troubled by this question.
i keep watching people
pour everything into themselves
their image, their brand, their fantasies.
and somehow
in doing all of that
they lose the very thing they were chasing.
because greatness doesn't live inside the self.
it only shows up
when you're reaching for something bigger.
we live in an individualistic world.
and yet
individualism and achievement
seem to move in opposite directions.
the more we turn inward,
the less we actually build.
look at the people we still talk about.
newton said it himself
"i stood on the shoulders of giants."
we picture them alone.
the lone genius, the solitary mind.
but that's the myth, not the truth.
they were surrounded.
they were connected.
they were part of something.
and they were building
not for themselves
but for what comes after.
could they have done it
thinking only of themselves?
maybe.
but today is a different game.
today the problems are too large
too tangled
too heavy
for any one person to carry.
and yet
we have never been more obsessed
with the self.
look at the powerful figures of our time.
the strongmen.
the ego projects with billions behind them.
the political kings who demand to be loved.
notice how hollow they feel.
some follow them
out of fear, out of habit, out of convenience.
but they sense it too.
the emptiness at the center.
these people will not be remembered
the way we remember those who gave something real.
and if they are remembered
it won't be with honor.
society doesn't celebrate
the ones who loved only themselves.
it remembers the ones who sacrificed.
who made themselves smaller
so the vision could grow larger.
greatness comes from a group
moving together
toward something worth moving toward.
no one truly follows a self-obsessed egotist
toward anywhere worth going.
thanks for reading.
comments